Kernza perennial wheatgrass field with deep roots anchoring rich topsoil, representing sustainable no-till grain agriculture
Kernza intermediate wheatgrass fields demonstrate perennial grain agriculture—crops that live for years, anchoring soil with 15-foot-deep roots and eliminating annual tillage.

By 2035, global food production will need to rise by 50% to feed 9 billion people. Meanwhile, conventional agriculture loses 24 billion tons of topsoil every year. Scientists and farmers are now asking: what if we could grow food without annual planting, without the plow that pulverizes soil into dust? Enter perennial grains—crops that live for years, send roots deeper than subway tunnels, and stay in the ground through winter. It's an inversion of industrial agriculture that could transform farming from a soil-destroying system into one that builds earth, captures carbon, and still puts bread on your table.

The Breakthrough Reshaping Agriculture

In Yunnan Province, rice farmers harvested their eighth consecutive crop from a single planting. The grain yields matched China's elite annual varieties—but farmers planted once and skipped replanting for four years. In Minnesota, intermediate wheatgrass fields produced grain year after year while roots stretched 8 inches deep, locking 7,000 pounds of dry root mass per acre into the soil. These aren't lab curiosities anymore. Perennial rice, marketed under varieties like PR23 and PR25, now covers thousands of acres. Kernza, a perennial wheatgrass trademarked by The Land Institute, appears in flour blends, craft beers like Patagonia Provisions' Long Root Ale, and on Kentucky farms backed by a $400,000 USDA grant.

The revolution turns on root systems. Annual crops die after harvest, leaving bare ground exposed to wind and water. Perennials establish thick root networks that hold soil in place, slow water runoff, and let moisture sink into aquifers. When tillage disappears, so do the diesel tractors crisscrossing fields every spring. Farmers save on fuel, seed, and labor. Soils that once eroded now accumulate organic matter—nearly a ton of carbon per hectare per year in perennial rice fields. That's not just climate mitigation. It's rebuilding fertility that industrial farming stripped away.

The Historical Arc: From Prairie to Plow to Perennial

Agriculture's story has been one of simplification. Twelve thousand years ago, humans domesticated wild grasses—wheat, barley, rice—selecting for larger seeds and plants that stayed put until harvest. That gave us civilization, but it also locked us into annuals. Every year, fields had to be cleared, tilled, planted. The plow became the icon of progress, and annual monocultures became the global standard.

The American tallgrass prairie told a different story. Before settlers broke the sod, perennial grasses like big bluestem and switchgrass sent roots 10 feet deep. Those roots weathered drought, held soil through storms, and supported bison herds and indigenous agriculture for millennia. When European farmers arrived with moldboard plows, they flipped the prairie upside down. Soil carbon oxidized into the atmosphere. Erosion claimed billions of tons of topsoil. The Dust Bowl of the 1930s—when black blizzards choked the Great Plains—proved the cost of annual tillage.

After World War II, the Green Revolution doubled down on annuals. Hybrid seeds, synthetic fertilizers, and mechanization sent yields soaring. Global famine retreated. But the model ran on cheap fossil fuels and abundant topsoil. As those resources dwindled, agronomists revisited a forgotten question: could we breed perennial versions of our staple crops and combine high yields with prairie-like resilience?

In 1976, Wes Jackson founded The Land Institute in Kansas to answer that question. He called the concept "an inversion of industrial agriculture." Instead of forcing nature to fit annual monocultures, why not mimic the prairie's diversity and perenniality? Over the next five decades, breeding programs at The Land Institute, the Rodale Research Center, and universities worldwide began crossing annual grains with perennial wild relatives. Progress was slow—hybridizing often produced infertile offspring, and perennial traits are controlled by many genes, not just one. But by the 2010s, Kernza and perennial rice had proven that the dream was achievable.

How Perennial Grains Work

Perennial crops don't die after producing seed. They overwinter, resprout in spring, and bear grain for multiple years from a single planting. That simple shift changes everything underground. Annual wheat sends roots down a foot or two before harvest kills the plant. Intermediate wheatgrass—the species behind Kernza—builds a massive rhizomatous root network. Within five years, stands produce up to 7,000 pounds of dry root mass per acre in the top 8 inches alone. Those roots don't just anchor soil. They exude sugars that feed bacteria and fungi, weaving a living mat that binds particles together.

Erosion control is immediate and dramatic. Perennial root systems tie up soil, preventing surface loss by wind and water. When rain hits bare annual fields, it runs off, carrying topsoil into rivers. Perennial fields absorb that water. Runoff slows, infiltration rises, and groundwater recharge improves. The U.S. Forest Service found that perennials can cut nitrate leaching too, because roots scavenge nutrients year-round instead of leaving them to wash away after annual crops are harvested.

Above ground, perennials emerge earlier than annuals. In Minnesota, perennial alfalfa is ready for its first harvest by early June, while annual soybean seedlings are just beginning to photosynthesize. By the time soybeans start growing, alfalfa has already produced 40% of the season's yield. Intermediate wheatgrass follows a similar pattern. It greens up in early spring, providing ground cover when annuals leave fields bare. That extended growing season translates into more photosynthesis, more carbon capture, and better weed suppression.

The nutritional profile can surprise you. Kernza grain contains higher protein, dietary fiber, and ash than wheat. It delivers 4.8 times more calcium and more than double the iron per 100 grams uncooked. Perennial rice matches elite annual varieties in protein and mineral content. The catch? Seed size and total grain yield lag behind conventional crops. Kernza averages 330 to 880 pounds per acre, about 26% of traditional wheat yields under similar conditions. Under ideal management, it can reach 30% of wheat yields. Perennial rice in China achieves yields equivalent to top annual varieties, but it took decades of breeding to get there.

Side-by-side soil core samples showing carbon-rich perennial grain soil versus depleted annual crop soil in agricultural research lab
Soil from perennial grain systems (left) shows dramatically higher organic carbon and structure compared to conventionally tilled annual crop soil (right)—the foundation of erosion control.

The Adoption Challenge: Economics and Infrastructure

Farmers don't grow crops for ecological elegance—they grow them to pay bills. Perennial grains face a yield gap that translates directly into income risk. If your wheat brings in $500 per acre and Kernza brings $150, switching feels like financial suicide, even if fuel and tillage costs drop.

That's where dual-use systems come in. Intermediate wheatgrass can be grazed or cut for hay early in the season, then combined for grain in July. A University of Minnesota trial found that dual-use systems initially produced 42% less grain than grain-only systems in year two, but by year four, dual-use fields matched or exceeded grain-only yields. Net returns varied—grain-only returned $721 per hectare per year in year two, while dual-use returned $609—but the dual-use system offered more flexibility for livestock operations. Forage crude protein averaged 140 to 150 grams per kilogram in fall and spring, comparable to high-quality hay.

For farmers with crop-livestock integration, dual-use management provides a practical pathway. You harvest forage income early, suppress weeds with mowing, and still combine grain later. On marginal or rolling ground where annual crops struggle, perennials stabilize soil and reduce erosion losses that eat into yields anyway. Lauren Brzozowski, a plant geneticist at the University of Kentucky, put it bluntly: "We don't see Kernza replacing wheat. It complements wheat. Maybe it's five or ten percent of a flour blend, or an option on rolling ground where annual crops struggle."

The real economic shift comes over time. Perennial systems slash operating costs by eliminating annual tillage, reducing seed purchases, and cutting fuel bills. You plant once every several years instead of every spring. Fertilizer needs may drop because perennial roots mine nutrients deeper and recycle them more efficiently. A Kentucky trial found that light nitrogen additions split over two applications keep plants vigorous, but total inputs were lower than for annual wheat.

Carbon markets could tip the balance. Perennial systems sequester carbon at rates that catch policymakers' attention. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimates that global soil carbon sequestration could mitigate up to 5.3 gigatons of CO₂ per year by 2030. If carbon credits pay farmers $20 to $50 per ton sequestered, perennial grains suddenly look more competitive. But voluntary carbon markets face severe uncertainties. Verification is expensive, prices remain low, and small or rented farms struggle to participate. Until robust, accessible carbon payment systems emerge, most farmers won't bet their livelihoods on climate credits.

Breeding the Next Generation

Perennial grain development isn't just field trials—it's a genetic marathon. Wild perennial relatives of wheat, rice, and other crops have traits we want (deep roots, regrowth), but they also carry traits we don't (small seeds, low yields, shattering). Crossing annuals with perennials often produces infertile F1 hybrids, because perennial traits are polygenic, controlled by suites of genes rather than a single switch. Successful breeding requires transferring all those genes while preserving high yields and seed size.

The Land Institute's Kernza program shows the timeline. After 25 years and 11 breeding cycles, seed size increased two- to threefold compared to the wild ancestor. Yield improvements followed, but Kernza still lags well behind wheat. Seed shattering—where ripe seeds fall off before harvest—has been dramatically reduced through selection. Disease resistance improved too. Hybridizing intermediate wheatgrass with wheat transfers leaf rust and powdery mildew resistance genes, conferring four leaf rust resistance genes and two powdery mildew resistance genes to wheat breeding lines.

Perennial rice took a different path. Researchers at the Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences and the International Rice Research Institute crossed annual rice with wild perennial relatives from Africa. After decades of selection, varieties like PR23 and PR25 produced grain for eight consecutive harvests over four years, with yields equivalent to China's best annuals. The breakthrough hinged on identifying and stacking polygenic traits for both perenniality and high yield, then field-testing across diverse environments.

Genetic tools accelerate progress. Marker-assisted selection lets breeders track desirable genes without waiting for plants to mature. Genomic sequencing of wild perennials reveals which regions control root depth, regrowth, and seed size. CRISPR gene editing could, in theory, insert perennial traits into elite annual varieties, though regulatory hurdles and public acceptance remain uncertain. Regardless of technique, breeding perennial grains remains slow compared to tweaking annuals, because evaluating perenniality requires multi-year trials.

Global Adoption: Lessons from China and the Midwest

Perennial rice adoption in China offers a case study in scaling. Smallholder farmers in Yunnan Province face labor shortages as young people migrate to cities. Replanting rice paddies every year demands intensive labor for tillage, transplanting, and weed control. Perennial rice eliminates replanting for four years, cutting labor needs by 60% according to some estimates. That alone justifies adoption for aging farm populations.

Soil health gains matter too. Yunnan's rice terraces have been farmed for centuries. Continuous tillage depletes organic matter and compacts soil. Switching to perennial rice accumulated almost a ton of organic carbon per hectare per year, reversing decades of degradation. Farmers report better soil structure, less erosion on slopes, and improved water retention. Those benefits compound over time, much like interest in a savings account.

In the U.S. Midwest, Kernza adoption follows a different logic. Large-scale grain farms prioritize yield and efficiency. Kernza's 26% to 30% yield compared to wheat makes it a hard sell for prime cropland. But on marginal land—erosion-prone slopes, degraded soils, or fields transitioning out of the Conservation Reserve Program—Kernza offers an economic niche. It stabilizes soil, provides wildlife habitat, and generates income from both grain and forage.

Corporate partnerships help bridge the gap. Maker's Mark bourbon distillery supplied additional support for Kentucky Kernza trials, exploring perennial grains for whiskey production. General Mills and other food companies have invested in Kernza supply chains, sourcing grain for experimental products. Consumer demand for sustainable, regenerative agriculture creates market pull, even if volumes remain small.

Farmers and researchers collaborating on perennial grain adoption strategies with yield data and grain samples at community agricultural meeting
The perennial grain transition requires collaboration between farmers, researchers, and policymakers to overcome yield gaps and build market infrastructure for these soil-saving crops.

Policy incentives could accelerate adoption. The European Union's Common Agricultural Policy rewards farmers for ecosystem services like carbon sequestration and biodiversity. U.S. programs like the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) offer cost-share payments for conservation practices, but perennial grain establishment costs aren't always covered. Expanding subsidy eligibility to include perennial grains—treating them like conservation crops with grain income—would lower financial barriers. Long-term contracts that guarantee minimum prices for perennial grain could reduce risk for early adopters.

International collaboration multiplies impact. Over 25 lead scientists worldwide have contributed to Kernza development since 2001. Research networks like the International Perennial Grains Consortium share germplasm, breeding techniques, and agronomic data. As climate change intensifies droughts and extreme weather, perennial grains' resilience becomes more attractive globally. Countries with severe erosion problems—think Ethiopia's highlands or India's Deccan Plateau—could leapfrog directly to perennial systems if seed supply and agronomic knowledge scale.

The Environmental Payoff

Agriculture is both victim and driver of climate change. It contributes roughly 25% of global greenhouse gas emissions through tillage, fertilizer production, and methane from livestock. At the same time, changing rainfall and temperature patterns threaten crop yields. Perennial grains attack both sides of the problem.

Carbon sequestration stands out. When you till soil, you aerate it, speeding decomposition of organic matter and releasing CO₂. No-till farming and cover crops slow that loss, potentially even increasing soil carbon. Perennial grains supercharge the effect. Roots pump carbon into soil year-round. Microbial communities process that carbon into stable humus. Measurements from perennial rice fields show organic carbon accumulation near 1 ton per hectare per year. Scale that across millions of acres, and you're talking meaningful climate mitigation.

Nitrogen management improves too. Synthetic nitrogen fertilizers account for about 2% of global energy use and emit nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas 300 times more potent than CO₂. Perennial roots scavenge nitrogen more efficiently than annuals, reducing fertilizer needs. They also capture nitrogen before it leaches into groundwater or runs off into rivers, where it fuels algal blooms and dead zones. Cleaner water and lower emissions come as a package deal.

Biodiversity gets a boost. Annual monocultures are ecological deserts—plowed, sprayed, and harvested before wildlife can establish. Perennial fields stay green longer, provide habitat for pollinators and birds, and support more diverse soil organisms. Studies of Kernza fields found higher populations of beneficial insects and ground-nesting birds compared to wheat monocultures. That diversity stabilizes ecosystems, making them more resilient to pests and diseases.

Erosion prevention might be the most underrated benefit. Globally, we lose 24 billion tons of topsoil annually. It takes centuries to build an inch of topsoil, but only a few years of poor management to wash it away. Perennial grains halt that loss. Roots hold soil in place, even on steep slopes. Water infiltrates instead of running off. Sediment stays on the field instead of clogging rivers and reservoirs. For regions already facing severe erosion—like sub-Saharan Africa or the Loess Plateau in China—perennial grains could mean the difference between continued degradation and recovery.

The Risks and Trade-Offs

Perennial grains aren't a silver bullet. The yield gap is real, and closing it will take decades more breeding. Farmers operating on thin margins can't afford a 70% yield cut, even with lower input costs. For landowners renting ground year-to-year, investing in perennial crops that take three or four years to reach full productivity makes no sense. Secure land tenure and long-term thinking are prerequisites.

Market infrastructure lags too. Grain elevators and mills are designed for wheat, corn, and soybeans. Kernza's smaller seeds require different equipment. Flour blends that include Kernza need recipe adjustments. Supply chains are fragmented, and premiums for perennial grain products remain modest. Until processors, distributors, and retailers build out perennial grain infrastructure, scaling remains difficult.

Agronomic knowledge is thin. Farmers don't have a century of trial-and-error experience with Kernza like they do with wheat. When to fertilize, how to control weeds, which pests to watch for—all those details need refinement region by region. Extension services and university research programs are starting to fill the gap, but information networks take time to build.

Genetic diversity poses another challenge. Kernza and perennial rice varieties released so far have narrow genetic bases. If a new disease emerges, it could wipe out entire regions before resistant varieties are bred. Annual crops face the same risk, but decades of breeding have created vast germplasm collections. Perennial grain programs need to build similar diversity fast.

There's also a risk of overselling climate benefits. Soil carbon sequestration faces uncertainties around measurement, permanence, and saturation. Soils can only hold so much carbon; once they reach equilibrium, sequestration slows. Tillage or disturbance can release stored carbon quickly. Verification is expensive, and accounting methods vary. If carbon markets crash or fail to materialize, farmers counting on those payments will be left holding the bag.

Preparing for the Perennial Future

If perennial grains are going to transform agriculture, what needs to happen next?

First, breeding programs need sustained funding. Developing a new perennial crop takes 30 to 50 years, far longer than private companies can justify. Public investment—from USDA, the Gates Foundation, or international research centers—has to carry the load. Partnerships between universities, non-profits like The Land Institute, and national agricultural research systems can pool resources and share breakthroughs.

Second, policy has to reward long-term soil health over short-term yields. Crop insurance, subsidies, and conservation programs all tilt toward annual monocultures right now. Rewriting those rules to favor perennials—or at least level the playing field—would accelerate adoption. Carbon markets with transparent pricing and low verification costs could tip the economic balance.

Third, supply chains need to scale. Food companies that source Kernza or perennial rice need to commit to multi-year contracts at prices that cover farmers' costs plus a margin. Equipment manufacturers should develop harvesters and cleaners optimized for perennial grains. Millers and bakers need to refine recipes and promote products. Consumer awareness campaigns can build demand, turning "regenerative grain" into a selling point like "organic" or "fair trade."

Fourth, agronomic research has to move faster. We need regionally adapted varieties, pest management strategies, and best practices for fertility and weed control. On-farm trials with farmer participation can generate data and trust simultaneously. Extension agents trained in perennial systems can mentor early adopters, creating local expertise.

Fifth, land tenure reform matters. If farmers don't own their land or have long-term leases, they won't invest in perennials. Policies that stabilize land access—like longer lease terms or right-of-first-refusal for renters—can remove a major barrier. Community land trusts and cooperative ownership models might offer alternatives to conventional rental markets.

Sixth, genetic tools need to be accessible. CRISPR and genomic selection can speed breeding, but if intellectual property locks them behind patents, developing countries and small research programs get shut out. Open-source germplasm, publicly funded genomics, and benefit-sharing agreements can keep perennial grain research inclusive.

Finally, education and culture have to shift. Farmers learn from neighbors, not journal articles. Demonstration plots, field days, and peer networks build confidence. Agricultural colleges need to teach perennial systems, not just annual row crops. A generation of agronomists, breeders, and policymakers fluent in perennial agriculture will drive change faster than any single technology.

The Path Forward

We stand at a crossroads. Industrial agriculture fed billions but left soils eroded, water polluted, and climate destabilized. Perennial grains offer a different trajectory: farming that builds soil, captures carbon, and still produces food. It's not a return to pre-industrial yields or subsistence farming. It's using modern genetics, agronomy, and markets to design systems that mimic nature's resilience.

The transition won't be instant. Kernza and perennial rice are first-generation crops, still improving. Yields will rise as breeding advances. Costs will fall as scale grows. Markets will mature as consumers demand sustainability. Policies will adapt as evidence mounts. But the direction is clear.

In 50 years, we might look back and see perennial grains as the pivot point—the moment agriculture stopped mining soil and started building it. Fields green with roots stretching deep, harvests year after year without replanting, carbon flowing into the ground instead of the atmosphere. It's a future where farming doesn't fight nature but works with it, where the land gets healthier while feeding us.

The revolution is quiet, measured in root depth and soil carbon. But its impact could echo for centuries, turning degraded landscapes into fertile ground again. That's the promise of perennial grains: not just food on the table, but a table that lasts.

Latest from Each Category